Today's hottest deals

HP 550-134nb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 550-134nb  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B2C
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 20:52
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 562
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 38.2
22% 31.1 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 20
21% 26.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 45 47 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 423
Write 350
Mixed 292
SusWrite 51.9
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 36.8
125% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 116
95% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Timetec UDIMM NP13 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-134nb Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-134nb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback