Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 278
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 990
89% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,460
90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
HP(103C 8702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 112
Parallax 126
103% 121 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 115
Splatting 104
106% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
265GB free
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 655 742 744 746 744 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,233
Write 1,220
Mixed 1,121
SusWrite 752
243% 1,082 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 74.2
260% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,098
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 980
732% 978 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 219%
Great: 219%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 34 83 76 91 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 78.7
Write 47.4
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 69.9
49% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
333GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 181 189 187 187 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 140
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 187
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
238% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 90%
HGST 1TB
740GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 98 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 100
Write 83.1
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 97
103% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 30.5
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 1.8
30% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 48%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 122 123 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 123
Write 128
Mixed 103
SusWrite 123
163% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 6.3 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 37.9
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 10.3
37% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16%
Great: 62%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
281GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 0.1 3.1 4.4 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 31.8
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 3.2
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 77%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 35 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 38
Write 34.9
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 31.7
44% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8ME-8XR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 32.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 152% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback