Dell Latitude E5550

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E5550  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime22.6 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 20:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 98
2-Core 171
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 235
33% 243 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 7.2
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Im3d B17A 512GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 8.7 4.4 238 288 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 448
Write 380
Mixed 327
SusWrite 103
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 22
97% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 1.1
63% 145 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5550 Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback