Asus Z270-WS

Performance Results


Gaming 138% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	631% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Z270-WS (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190523
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration	389 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 148 2-Core 296 99% 179 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 806 81% 658 Pts	64-Core 809 50% 809 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 4069) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	143% Outstanding	Lighting 201 Reflection 250 Parallax 171 164% 208 fps	MRender 205 Gravity 160 Splatting 142 135% 169 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 20 20 18 31 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	631% Outstanding	Read 7,460 Write 56.6 Mixed 106 SusWrite 19.8 397% 1,911 MB/s	4K Read 823 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 6 1,256% 277 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 631% Great: 410%
Asmt 2115 256GB 374 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 234GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 135 81 107 97 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 373 Write 214 Mixed 204 SusWrite 117 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 15.4 66% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 57.3 55% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 71%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 246GB free Firmware: RVQ0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 17 18 19 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 2,362 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 95 65 82 75 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 369 Write 332 Mixed 331 SusWrite 83.9 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 25.4 81% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 64.8 DQ Mixed 170 111% 133 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 97%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 424GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 15 18 16 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 238GB free Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 147 91 116 107 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 432 Write 363 Mixed 348 SusWrite 129 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 32.3 106% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 168 134% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 217GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 150 102 120 100 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 508 Write 434 Mixed 367 SusWrite 133 80% 361 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 36.3 116% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 68.3 DQ Mixed 144 126% 197 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 632GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 90 115 104 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 432 Write 362 Mixed 348 SusWrite 83.4 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 33.1 117% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 124 110% 174 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 135%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 2TB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 95 66 82 74 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 372 Write 315 Mixed 321 SusWrite 83.1 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 18.1 76% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 83.3 DQ Mixed 140 97% 122 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 97%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 2GB free Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,251 Write 56.2 Mixed 106 513% 2,471 MB/s	4K Read 835 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 5.4 1,273% 281 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 164GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 413 427 403 427 432 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 437 Mixed 375 SusWrite 420 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 37.1 132% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 132 118% 189 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 134%
Asmedia ASM1053E 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 968GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 89 63 80 72 73 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 123 Write 115 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 80.6 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 264% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 8TB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4.5TB free Firmware: SN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 92 78 88 82 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 115 Write 96.9 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 87.6 60% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB 1,215 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3020 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	99.7% Outstanding	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 38.1 MC Mixed 31.2 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 41.5 SC Mixed 30 90% 31.3 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270-WS Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z270-WS

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	57x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	5x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	6x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	6x
M470 1TBMSIBench 341%, 1,979 samples	6x

RAM
BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 2x8GBCrucialBench 74%, 3,023 samples	7x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 80%, 730 samples	6x
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $565

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16