Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A1
Memory	60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 194 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 659 61% 509 Pts	64-Core 1,050 65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.44% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 10.7 7% 9.87 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 9.6 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.44% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 419 416 418 417 420 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 413 Write 407 Mixed 352 SusWrite 421 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 34.3 120% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 351 265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 7.5TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 24GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 134 135 137 133 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 168 Write 161 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 136 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.6 328% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 211%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 7TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 23 24 24 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 69.4 Write 21.3 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 22.8 24% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TFT1 4x16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	MC Read 56.8 MC Write 43.7 MC Mixed 47.2 141% 49.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M740 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	22x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	12x
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	13x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	12x
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	7x

SSD
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	6x
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	6x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	5x

RAM
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	7x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 66%, 1,144 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16