Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A1
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '22 at 16:01
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 190 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 694 62% 526 Pts	64-Core 1,047 65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 10.6 7% 9.77 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 9.4 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 414 411 410 414 413 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 414 Write 415 Mixed 341 SusWrite 413 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 34.5 118% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 352 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 7.5TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 24GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 140 137 135 138 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 142 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 139 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.7 339% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 211%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 7TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 24 22 23 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 152 Write 14.1 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 22.9 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TFT1 4x16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 56 MC Write 43.2 MC Mixed 47.1 139% 48.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 20.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M740 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	22x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	12x
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	13x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	12x
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	7x

SSD
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	6x
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	6x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	5x

RAM
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	7x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 66%, 1,144 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16