HP Elite 7000 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Elite 7000 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A90h
Memory15.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 09:49
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 131
60% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 260
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
671GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 74 75 76 76 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 236
Write 66.2
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 71.9
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 14.1
66% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 91.1
77% 115 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
769GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 116 114 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62% Good
Read 101
Write 108
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 115
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
98GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 91
Write 85.5
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 90.6
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 76%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
3GB free, PID 0181
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 12 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 11.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 11.2
15% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 E386 AQ24M72E8BLK0M M378B5673EH1-CH9 E386 AQ24M72E8BLK0M 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite 7000 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite 7000 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback