Toshiba Satellite L510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L510  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4200-$99
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 60.8
37% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 59.4
8-Core 59.5
8% 59.5 Pts
64-Core 60.8
4% 60.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Toshiba(1179 FF11)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 207 213 214 182 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 236
Write 208
Mixed 220
SusWrite 191
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 19
67% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 92
70% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 100%
SDHC Card 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 20 19 16 9.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 21
Write 11.7
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 17
21% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
180% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L510 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback