Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 09:31
Run Duration676 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 102
50% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 156
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 9.5
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.3
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Skihotar A320 120G 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 38 27 33 37 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 403
Write 79.5
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 34.6
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 7.8
45% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 5.6
10% 19 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 77%
Initio INIC-3619 500GB
69GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 14.7
Write 37.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 54.9
48% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-1600Mh 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback