Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '17 at 18:27
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 521
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.16% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.2
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.16%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 481
Write 338
Mixed 330
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 21.9
93% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 39.7
80% 163 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
744GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 89.1
Write 130
Mixed 79.5
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.16
79% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 85%
TrekStor DS pocket g.u 500GB
337GB free, PID 0017
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 41.9
Mixed 23.2
43% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.26
33% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 21%
WD 2500BEVExternal 250GB
58GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 35
Mixed 34.3
45% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.28
59% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback