LG 16Z90P-G.BH71P2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 16Z90P-G.BH71P2  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 16Z90P
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 19:24
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 156
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 325
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1854 0400) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 20.2
19% 23.9 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 17.5
16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ21901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 592 88 85 225 320 322 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,594
Write 1,316
Mixed 1,016
SusWrite 272
234% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 45
171% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 696
521% 699 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 164%
Great: 232%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
460GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1800 1069 837 834 820 790 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,614
Write 1,475
Mixed 1,413
SusWrite 1,025
311% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 64.3
202% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 734
539% 713 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 222%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 37.2
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 13.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 16Z90P-G.BH71P2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: LG 16Z90P-G.BH71P2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback