Lenovo 30A0CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30A0CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 21:15
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 188
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 494
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
PNY(196E 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 21.9
17% 20.7 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 17.7
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 231 322 79 2.6 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 998
Write 583
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 112
93% 428 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1
29% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 21.3
DQ Mixed 8.9
22% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 237%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 33 28 35 31 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A0CTO1WW Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A0CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback