Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 17:03
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 146
60% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 413
43% 344 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PowerColor(148C 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 69
40% 51.9 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 44.5
Splatting 22.3
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2BF180A4L 180GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSTi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 130 153 157 161 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 310
Write 162
Mixed 228
SusWrite 155
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 34.8
128% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 127
118% 183 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
828GB free
Firmware: AP2E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 110 113 110 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 105
Write 99.3
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 112
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
414GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 93.6
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 103
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback