Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 91.4 1-Core 132 2-Core 257 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 504 67% 499 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 24 Parallax 18.9 15% 20.5 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 19.5 Splatting 17.4 14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 452 Write 413 Mixed 361 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 48.4 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 63.7 221% 79 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 349 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 223GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 103 102 104 104 103 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 98.4 Write 97.6 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 101 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston D48GB-2666 1x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 12.1 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 12.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	23x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $347