Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 32 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 144 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 512 50% 413 Pts	64-Core 1129 70% 1129 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600 3,885 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 11BD) 2GB CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 20.3 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 17.4 16% 18.6 fps	MRender 20.1 Gravity 19.5 Splatting 16 15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 91 82 80 82 46 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.5% Poor	Read 189 Write 175 Mixed 124 SusWrite 76.5 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 8.8 50% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 52.9 DQ Mixed 23.4 22% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 81GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 135 137 136 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 102 Write 103 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 135 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 109%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 85 84 84 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 103 Write 111 Mixed 32 SusWrite 82.1 60% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 6 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.8% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 164%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	43x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	17x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	17x

SSD
RBU-SC152DS3764GG 64GBKingstonBench 59%, 13 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92