PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X8SIE (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X8SIE |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120627 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '22 at 09:13 |
Run Duration | 192 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
65.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ortial SSD 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 57 57 57 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
105GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 58 58 58 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate BUP Ultra Touch 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon X3470IntelBench 69%, 8,730 samples | 10x |
Xeon X3460IntelBench 68%, 780 samples | 5x |
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples | 2x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 2x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2x |
SSD | |
---|---|
SSD 128GBOrtialBench 77%, 204 samples | 4x |
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples | 1x |
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |