Lenovo 2349BG5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 2349BG5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349BG5
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 05:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3380M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 59
35% 51 Pts
4-Core 82.8
8-Core 81.3
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 83
5% 83 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5400M
Legend(17AA 21F4) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 1.3
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 204 210 192 178 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 458
Write 343
Mixed 198
SusWrite 202
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 31
102% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 209
192% 296 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2349BG5 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2349BG5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback