Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150812
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '22 at 03:29
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8310 1,697 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 85.3 1-Core 57 2-Core 103 53% 81.7 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 326 31% 258 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.1% Excellent	Lighting 99.5 Reflection 108 Parallax 98.5 81% 102 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 96.7 Splatting 95.2 78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: U21010RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 320 360 357 367 373 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 250 Write 349 Mixed 251 SusWrite 344 68% 298 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 16.4 102% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 102 104% 168 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 180 180 180 179 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 135 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 178 89% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4GBH1X04F1AA28-15 4GBH1X04F1AA28-15 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 17.9 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

CPU
FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples	31x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	14x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	10x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SSD 500GBSeagateBench 90%, 1,930 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	2x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 42%, 103 samples	5x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 651 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16