Acer Aspire 514-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire 514-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Lily_TL
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 261
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 362
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1468) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8439
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 12.1
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 14.8
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F8ABR1-256GB 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 245 190 163 120 322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,598
Write 180
Mixed 598
SusWrite 241
142% 654 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 20.4
182% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 108
219% 428 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 156%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Adata 4JQA-0622AC 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 21.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 19.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 514-54 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 514-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback