Acer Aspire A514-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A514-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Lily_TL
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 247
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 360
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1468) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8439
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.18% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 14.3
10% 14 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 14.7
8% 8.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.18%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F8ABR1-256GB 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 645 375 320 173 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 1,235
Mixed 972
SusWrite 418
234% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 25.8
203% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 1001
DQ Mixed 358
368% 579 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 177%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4S3200J4G22-B 4JQA-0622AC 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 20.5
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 20.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-54 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback