Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive483% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory36.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 07:16
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 146
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 476
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 6510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 142
Parallax 140
117% 142 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
111% 140 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 36 38 37 42 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 6,390
Write 42.5
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 34.7
340% 1,639 MB/s
4K Read 559
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 4.7
854% 188 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 483%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
893GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 202 199 213 216 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 194
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 106%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 1TB
141GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 34 36 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 16.4
Write 36.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 33.8
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 59 58 62 68 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 53.6
Write 70.7
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 64.2
48% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
157% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZN F4-3200C16-16GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZN 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 37.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 30
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback