Asus PRIME B365M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-A  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 05:40
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,032
98% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 111
Parallax 116
97% 115 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 104
Splatting 96.1
90% 113 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
570GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 107 124 144 84 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 400
Write 365
Mixed 113
SusWrite 146
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 5.5
48% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 25.9
36% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 56%
Nvme INTEL MEMPEK1J01 14GB
315GB free
Firmware: K4110420 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 181 184 185 184 183 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 108
Write 159
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 183
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
7% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 234%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
349GB free
Firmware: MKAOAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 88 90 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 91
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
159GB free
Firmware: MKAONS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 124 133 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 139
Write 147
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 122
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
175GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 99 98 87 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 104
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 98.3
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 23
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 16
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B365M-A Builds (Compare 5,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback