Toshiba Satellite C850-F32Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C850-F32Q  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime15.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 14:05
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 114
53% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 171
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 206 202 187 172 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 355
Write 325
Mixed 320
SusWrite 197
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 40.9
114% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 116
144% 255 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
180GB free
Firmware: AX002M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 112 112 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 110
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 112
64% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C850-F32Q Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C850-F32Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback