Asus K53U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K53U  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53U
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 23:24
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 16.3
2-Core 28.9
36% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 30.7
8-Core 24.9
4% 27.8 Pts
64-Core 24.8
2% 24.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Asus(1043 104C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.45 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 149 95 95 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 379
Write 147
Mixed 283
SusWrite 140
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 11.5
39% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72.7
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 69.3
52% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
226GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 52 51 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 62.4
Write 65.3
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 51.1
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53U Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback