TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu FMVS04004

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu FMVS04004  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB297
Memory14.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3360 x 2100 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 09:08
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 148
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 234
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 64.1%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 030H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 95 102 97 103 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 372
Write 120
Mixed 180
SusWrite 98.9
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 4.3
35% 8.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 30.8%
 Great: 70%
Jmicron Tech0 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 108 138 145 149 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.5% Excellent
Read 165
Write 152
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 137
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 86.5%
 Great: 87%
Jmicron Tech1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 105 135 143 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 133
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 82.8%
 Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung D471A2K43CB1-CPB 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback