ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150528
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '15 at 02:16
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 72.3 2-Core 146 49% 109 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 460 46% 372 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 366F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5900 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 62.1 59% 68.3 fps	MRender 74.2 Gravity 65.2 Splatting 56.8 53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 180 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 539 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 66 (A3) Unknown 100 100 25 (A4) Unknown 100 100 12373 (A5) Unknown 100 100 40 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 10 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 125 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 22 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 29811 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 53046 (F2) Unknown 100 100 102550 (F5) Unknown 100 100 98984	74.8% Very good	Read 502 Write 361 Mixed 410 94% 424 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 18.6 95% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 18.2 39% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 103%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 551GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 174 2266 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 33 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 8 (C2) HDA temperature 120 117 23 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	94.5% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 147 Mixed 140 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.32 4K Write 2.74 4K Mixed 0.27 136% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 412GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 360 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2429 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 1288 (07) Seek error rate 78 55 39169495075 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21284 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2486 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BC) Unknown 100 99 5 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 61 420806680 (C2) HDA temperature 24 40 51539607576 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 45 25 360 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -10393820835013 (F1) Unknown 100 253 884106878 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3835189843	41.8% Average	Read 89.5 Write 56.3 Mixed 80.8 57% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.41 76% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 947 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 740GB free, PID a003 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 105 Write 69.5 Mixed 83.1 105% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.26 71% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,344 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 437GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 97.1 132% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.21 70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 45%
WDC WD16 00BEVS-22VAT0 160GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 144GB free, PID ce15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 28.4 Mixed 9.67 27% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.28 74% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	572x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	111x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	75x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback