Samsung 850XBC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung 850XBC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT850XBC-X719
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 19:37
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 257
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 734
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Sanyo(144D C17B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 86.1
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 87.5
70% 89.5 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 79.2
75% 93.4 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7102Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 973 865 804 736 703 738 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 787
Write 1,551
Mixed 797
SusWrite 803
224% 985 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 74.5
243% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,113
DQ Write 892
DQ Mixed 996
747% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 201%
Great: 293%
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
147GB free
Firmware: GXA7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1282 997 845 749 715 807 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 850
Write 853
Mixed 971
SusWrite 899
202% 893 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 80.8
263% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 1,097
826% 1,109 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 220%
Great: 433%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
355GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 392 389 390 395 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 385
Mixed 389
SusWrite 391
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 46.9
152% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 321
241% 324 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 27.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850XBC Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Samsung 850XBC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback