Samsung 850XBC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung 850XBC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT850XBC-X719
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 252
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 746
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Sanyo(144D C17B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Lighting 93.6
Reflection 102
Parallax 93.9
76% 96.3 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 85.1
Splatting 86.6
80% 99.6 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7102Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 940 816 810 689 718 688 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 779
Write 1,284
Mixed 873
SusWrite 777
210% 928 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 73.6
235% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,119
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1,007
751% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 197%
Great: 293%
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
147GB free
Firmware: GXA7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1223 907 923 713 769 697 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 840
Mixed 797
SusWrite 872
186% 824 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 79.4
258% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 1,116
836% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 215%
Great: 433%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
355GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 393 392 391 395 388 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 377
Mixed 369
SusWrite 393
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 46.6
148% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 320
241% 324 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 27.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 850XBC Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Samsung 850XBC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback