Janus H61H2-MV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJanus H61H2-MV  (all builds)
MotherboardJanus H61H2-MV
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140822
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 510
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8642) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 15.3
13% 16.4 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 18.2
Splatting 16.5
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 15%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Elitegroup(1019 7DF5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 157 126 121 109 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 209
Write 38.8
Mixed 169
SusWrite 120
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 5.4
56% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 29
DQ Mixed 6.1
10% 20 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
357GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 129 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 133
Write 127
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 128
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-MV Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Janus H61H2-MV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback