Gigabyte GA-M68M-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M68M-S2P  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 04:16
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 79
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 84
45% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 84.8
11% 84.4 Pts
64-Core 83.2
5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545016B9A 160GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PBBO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 36 47 50 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 58
Write 55.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 46.9
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
427GB free
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 109 104 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 107
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.7
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M68M-S2P Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M68M-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback