Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 240 5,506 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	41.3% Average	Memory 72 1-Core 39 2-Core 60.3 40% 57.1 Pts	4-Core 65.8 8-Core 64 9% 64.9 Pts	64-Core 66.2 4% 66.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT 12,718 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545016B9A 160GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: PBBO SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 33 26 47 26 46 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 41.8 Write 47.4 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 33.8 28% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 34%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 427GB free Firmware: AX00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 96 107 107 107 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 105 63% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 6.2 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	7x
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples	5x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	3x

SSD
LCS-256L9S- 256GBLiteonitBench 60%, 2 samples	3x
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 69%, 18 samples	2x