HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 843F
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '22 at 01:10
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G4900-$42 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 52% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 92 2-Core 169 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 182 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 843F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 3.9 3% 2.97 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 6.5 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA800 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 103 Mixed 34.9 51% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
FTM24N32 5H 240GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 223GB free, PID 0735 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 14 33 36 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.5% Above average	Read 34.9 Write 34.4 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 31.1 46% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 5.4 619% 7.97 MB/s	DQ Read 7.7 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 7.3 746% 9.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 154%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 2,458 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 10.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 4.1 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

CPU
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	176x
Celeron G4900Intel $42Bench 52%, 1,971 samples	158x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	92x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	157x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 3%, 1,675 samples	142x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	119x

SSD
SSD 250GBPcieBench 192%, 239 samples	13x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	10x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	7x

RAM
M378A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 2,458 samples	68x
4ATF51264AZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 37%, 824 samples	29x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16