Positivo D3200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPositivo D3200  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIH310EF
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 23:20
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 224
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 501
66% 494 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
ASRock(1849 5122) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 124
Parallax 160
90% 131 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 112
Splatting 77.7
77% 95.8 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3701101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 367 375 415 427 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 387
Mixed 388
SusWrite 391
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 32.7
142% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 122
135% 226 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
354GB free
Firmware: S3701101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 378 386 421 429 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 357
Mixed 358
SusWrite 403
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 32.9
144% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 116
131% 219 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion 240GB
205GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 361 191 169 79 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 313
Write 302
Mixed 281
SusWrite 218
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 21.6
74% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 21.9
56% 118 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMU4RCC3C0K0464SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3200 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo D3200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback