Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE-CF  (all builds)
Memory112 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 13:19
Run Duration510 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 966
89% 745 Pts
64-Core 1474
91% 1474 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 219
Parallax 260
195% 239 fps
MRender 273
Gravity 239
Splatting 185
185% 232 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 173%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 1220 1387 1432 1441 1473 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,968
Write 2,283
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 1,326
402% 1,784 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 74.4
243% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 1,138
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 990
743% 998 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 280%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
249GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1794 1567 1512 1507 1487 1513 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 1,958
Write 2,194
Mixed 1,510
SusWrite 1,563
407% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 76.4
249% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1193
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 1,022
769% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 298%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
40GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 478 478 342 217 219 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 465
Mixed 441
SusWrite 369
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 48.8
160% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 47.2
118% 248 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
737GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2237 2179 1534 1539 1556 1552 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 1,911
Write 2,219
Mixed 1,457
SusWrite 1,766
415% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 74.4
237% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 1,092
826% 1,115 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 308%
Great: 410%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
821GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 423 425 420 416 415 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 399
Mixed 308
SusWrite 420
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 32
118% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 173
170% 272 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect CMV32GX4M1A2666C18 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE-CF Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME WATERFORCE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,024
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback