Positivo D3200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPositivo D3200  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIH310EF
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$122
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 245
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 494
66% 493 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
ASRock(1849 5122) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 123
Parallax 150
83% 125 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 112
Splatting 77.3
75% 93.9 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 156 108 14 68 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 487
Write 411
Mixed 20
SusWrite 81
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 1.2
73% 174 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
145GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 154 166 220 198 195 MB/s
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.6% Good
Read 197
Write 94.7
Mixed 214
SusWrite 186
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 28.2
107% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 206
164% 227 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
220GB free
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 151 165 124 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 473
Write 326
Mixed 307
SusWrite 125
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 38.2
134% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 117
96% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
372GB free
Firmware: S3701101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 161 177 243 249 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 492
Write 387
Mixed 346
SusWrite 211
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 32.2
114% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 121
130% 212 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMU4RCC3C0K0464SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3200 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo D3200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback