OEM G41 775 ICH7 8712

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardOEM G41 775 ICH7 8712  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191012
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 20 '22 at 17:33
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 79.5
42% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 157
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B 1341) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.8
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 81 76 79 76 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 160
Write 111
Mixed 124
SusWrite 96.8
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 15.1
66% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 27.6
DQ Mixed 20.6
16% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
464GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 130 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 118
Write 121
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 130
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Adata 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41 775 ICH7 8712 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: OEM G41 775 ICH7 8712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback