Biostar TH67+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TH67+  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 157
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 276
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Biostar(1565 110D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128gb EVM SSD 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 41 11 64 21 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 292
Write 276
Mixed 257
SusWrite 52.7
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 17.8
89% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 24.8
31% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston HP698650-154-KEF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TH67+ Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TH67+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback