TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 09:26
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 417
52% 398 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 79.1%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 15
Parallax 10.7
11% 13 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 13
Splatting 13.8
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 10.7%
 Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 309 288 305 308 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 463
Mixed 381
SusWrite 312
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 48
167% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 359
273% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 124%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
111GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 403 3.1 3.2 3 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 443
Write 423
Mixed 386
SusWrite 87.8
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 22.7
117% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 0.5
66% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 68.1%
 Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
87GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 23 23 23 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 22.4
Mixed 2
SusWrite 18.5
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.7
188% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 17.2%
 Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-400.A00LF Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 9905403-400.A00LF Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 51.5%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel  $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples237x
Core i5-2500KIntel  $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples130x
Core i7-2600Intel  $200Bench 67%, 185,630 samples80x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples44x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples39x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples30x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples28x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples26x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples22x
RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples22x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback