| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Monster TULPAR T7 V18.3 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Notebook TULPAR T7 V18.3 |
| Memory | 23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200622 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '22 at 08:32 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
91.9%
Outstanding
|
93% 171 Pts
|
87% 720 Pts
|
79% 1,274 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
118%
Outstanding
|
123% 161 fps
|
119% 149 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 638 639 638 631 636 MB/s
|
238%
Outstanding
|
297% 1,331 MB/s
|
272% 94.4 MB/s
|
663% 891 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$40
426GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 84 84 83 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
54% 72.8 MB/s
|
107% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
87.6%
Excellent
|
89% 31.1 GB/s
|
80% 28 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TULPAR T7 V18.3 Builds (Compare 25 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Monster TULPAR T7 V18.3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $415Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 23x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $262Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 1x |
| Core i9-9900KFIntel $272Bench 98%, 50,265 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 112%, 4,380 samples | 23x |
| RTX 2080S (Super Mobile)NvidiaBench 116%, 2,359 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $415 |