Thunderobot 911MT ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemThunderobot 911MT ST  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NH58DXQ-H
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 06:42
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 119
2-Core 216
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 538
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Clevo(1558 8535) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5720
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.5% Below average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 49.6
Parallax 35.7
39% 44.4 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 40
38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 512GB 512GB
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111C0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1282 1329 1110 531 696 709 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,501
Write 1,168
Mixed 929
SusWrite 943
254% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 26.8
172% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 517
476% 734 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 205%
Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMKS8G68AHFHD-32A 0710 TMKS8G68ALFBCH-2933Y 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.3
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 21.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 911MT ST Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Thunderobot 911MT ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback