Thunderobot 911MT ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemThunderobot 911MT ST  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NH58DXQ-H
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 12:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 668
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Clevo(1558 8535) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5720
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 47.3
41% 50.2 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 43.1
40% 50 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 512GB 512GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111C0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 1120 608 617 591 580 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,739
Write 1,133
Mixed 942
SusWrite 764
255% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 22.2
118% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 52.5
DQ Mixed 105
170% 353 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 172%
Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMKS8G68AHFHD-32A 0710 TMKS8G68ALFBCH-2933Y 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 24.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 26.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 911MT ST Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Thunderobot 911MT ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback