Lenovo 113798M

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 129% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 113798M (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '22 at 00:49
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 827 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 179 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 707 61% 522 Pts	64-Core 2,273 141% 2,273 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 219 Reflection 200 Parallax 190 178% 203 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 149 Splatting 133 125% 157 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB 11,733 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 274GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 303 303 299 297 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 369 Write 264 Mixed 229 SusWrite 301 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 26.1 97% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.2 DQ Write 63.8 DQ Mixed 47.6 37% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 115%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 74 75 84 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 75.3 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 81.9 56% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965433-153.A 9965433-153.A Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.9% Good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 25.5 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 113798M Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: Lenovo 113798M

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v21stBench 68%, 827 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	4x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
WDS500G2B0B 500GBWDCBench 96%, 11,733 samples	3x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	1x

RAM
9965433-153.A 9965433-153.A Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- 32GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	5x
M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- Kingston 9965433-153.A M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- 32GBSamsungBench 65%, 1 sample	1x
M393B1G70QH0- M393B1G70QH0- Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4A M393B1G70QH0- 32GBSamsungBench 89%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $500

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16