Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '17 at 14:38
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 603
66% 521 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.25
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 37.8
35% 40.8 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 34.3
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP600 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 477
Write 155
Mixed 239
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 21.3
104% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 32
73% 154 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 92%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
118GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 66.2
Mixed 67.2
51% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.25
86% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
249GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 81
Mixed 61.6
92% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.24
80% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0737 EWB8GB681PAE-16IC 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback