Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 97.6
1-Core 134
2-Core 276
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 942
91% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,550
96% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Asus(1043 87EB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 252
Parallax 285
230% 273 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 237
Splatting 172
192% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 354 376 330 326 315 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 524
Mixed 659
SusWrite 344
180% 826 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 63.1
238% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 339
329% 545 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 194%
Great: 247%
Intel Optane+3.6TBHDD
2TB free
Firmware: 18.31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 248 274 274 83 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 120%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
210GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 419 482 483 484 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 489
Mixed 450
SusWrite 410
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 60
208% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
234GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1126 1194 313 339 380 376 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,075
Write 1,088
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 621
219% 973 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 88.1
294% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,496
DQ Write 1,269
DQ Mixed 1,355
1,023% 1,373 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 234%
Great: 365%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
594GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 204 205 207 206 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 318
Write 281
Mixed 93
SusWrite 202
162% 224 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 149%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL.9BWWR.254 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 47.7
84% 47.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback