Asus G551JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G551JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G551JW
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 21:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 523
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Asus(1043 185D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 22.7
18% 21.3 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSH-256 253GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0831A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 225 225 229 228 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 452
Write 215
Mixed 175
SusWrite 217
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 10.7
75% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 60.3
78% 137 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 127 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 125
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G551JW Builds (Compare 652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback