Lenovo 113798M

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 113798M (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '22 at 20:56
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 827 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 183 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 675 61% 513 Pts	64-Core 2,259 140% 2,259 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.2% Average	Lighting 59.9 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 62.4 49% 64 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 61.5 Splatting 54.9 50% 62 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB 11,733 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 274GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 311 304 305 298 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 383 Write 302 Mixed 170 SusWrite 304 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 38.7 120% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 99.5 DQ Mixed 37.3 37% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 115%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 413GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 30 54 68 76 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 74.5 Write 70 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 60.4 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965433-153.A 9965433-153.A Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	68.1% Good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 24.2 78% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.7 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 92 44% 92 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 113798M Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: Lenovo 113798M

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v21stBench 68%, 827 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	4x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
WDS500G2B0B 500GBWDCBench 96%, 11,733 samples	3x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	1x

RAM
9965433-153.A 9965433-153.A Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- Samsung M393B5173FHD- 32GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	5x
M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- Kingston 9965433-153.A M393B5173FHD- M393B5173FHD- 32GBSamsungBench 65%, 1 sample	1x
M393B1G70QH0- M393B1G70QH0- Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4A M393B1G70QH0- 32GBSamsungBench 89%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $500

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16