Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 12:03
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 213
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 781
72% 604 Pts
64-Core 1108
69% 1108 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 93.3
57% 75.8 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 74
Splatting 48.3
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 819 811 822 831 832 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,336
Mixed 1,827
SusWrite 866
422% 1,887 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 77.4
255% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 437
328% 441 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 253%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
120GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 276 276 275 276 265 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 306
Mixed 378
SusWrite 295
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 47.3
158% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 233
184% 255 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 118%
WDC WD8004FRYZ-01VAEB0 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 156 160 157 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 163
Write 164
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 158
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.6
10% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 2.2
DQ Write 6.7
DQ Mixed 6.4
4% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 28%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 129 129 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 157
Write 144
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 129
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 108%
WD My Book 1TB
125GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 40 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 33.4
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 38.8
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA050 500GB
199GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 31
Write 29.9
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 33.4
42% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 37.5
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 29.8
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback