Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2991-A1
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110913
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '22 at 01:41
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 76.4 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 153 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 208 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 13.8 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 11.1 11% 13.7 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 14.7 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 233GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 236 228 229 237 233 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.4% Good	Read 253 Write 233 Mixed 237 SusWrite 228 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 34.6 109% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 179 141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54 6,728 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 76 74 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 90.6 Write 96.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 77.9 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 59%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 145GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 77 77 77 78 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 28.2 Write 79.3 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 77.3 39% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E500 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	25x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	19x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	49x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	8x
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 1,861 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	17x
S700 500GBHP $60Bench 71%, 12,813 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CH9 Apacer 78.C1GET.AU10C M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GBSamsungBench 31%, 4 samples	4x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 48%, 5 samples	4x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369