Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E500  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2991-A1
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 147
59% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 16
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.6 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
233GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 231 223 232 237 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.4% Good
Read 245
Write 234
Mixed 229
SusWrite 228
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 36.3
113% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 179
141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 83 82 87 92 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47% Average
Read 78.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 85.2
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
145GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
30% Below average
Read 25.8
Write 77.4
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 78.7
38% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E500 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback