Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime15.9 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 22:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770R
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 513
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V1 Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 11
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 281 282 286 287 287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 476
Mixed 377
SusWrite 304
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.4
199% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 295
222% 298 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Kingspec KSD-SA25.7-032MJ 30GB
28GB free
Firmware: 1.095.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.3% Poor
Read 236
Write 34.3
Mixed 58
SusWrite 34.3
20% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 5.8
50% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.9
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 5.7
11% 23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G3S160BM.M16FED 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M4HM87P-00 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback